Tag archives: intellectual property

Apple’s Tacking Attempt in Trademark Opposition Hits a Sour Note

Photo of Stephanie Schmidt (US)By Stephanie Schmidt (US) on Posted in Trademark
On April 4, in Bertini v. Apple Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) clarified the limitations of tacking and its application in establishing priority in trademark disputes. This case sets an important precedent for tacking use of a mark in the trademark registration context and highlights the limitations of … Continue reading

China’s accession to the Apostille Convention: Authentication procedure for foreign documents used in China to be greatly simplified

Photo of Justin Davidson (HK)Photo of Stanley NgBy Justin Davidson (HK) and Stanley Ng on Posted in Enforcement, General, Intellectual Property, Litigation
On March 8, 2023, China deposited an instrument for accession to the Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (also known as the “Apostille Convention”). Upon the scheduled implementation of the Apostille Convention in China on November 7, 2023, the expensive and time-consuming consular legalisation procedure that foreign … Continue reading

The New York Times Company Secures Registration of Six Column Names, Including LIKE A BOSS and THE NEW OLD AGE

Photo of Kaylee A. Sill (US)By Kaylee A. Sill (US) on Posted in Trademark
In a precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) reversed six refusals to register The New York Times Company’s (the “Times”) names of its newspaper columns, THE NEW OLD AGE, A GOOD APPETITE, HUNGRY CITY, WORK FRIEND, OFF THE SHELF, and LIKE A BOSS (the “Marks”). The Times applied to register the … Continue reading

A Later-Filed Unattacked Registration Establishes Priority in Board Proceedings

Photo of Felicia Boyd (US)Photo of Nathan Mannebach (US)By Felicia Boyd (US) and Nathan Mannebach (US) on Posted in Trademark
In a precedential decision, The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) refused to reconsider its decision sustaining an opposition to registration of the mark “LOVETTE” on the basis of likelihood of confusion with the mark “NNENNA LOVETTE.” Nkanginieme v. Appleton, 2023 TTAB LEXIS 64 (TTAB Mar. 7, 2023). In its request for reconsideration Applicant, Lovette … Continue reading

Three Year Battle Ends with Lizzo Securing Registration for 100% THAT BITCH Mark

Photo of Kaylee A. Sill (US)By Kaylee A. Sill (US) on Posted in Brands, Intellectual Property, Trademark
In a precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) reversed two refusals to register Grammy-winning singer Lizzo’s 100% THAT BITCH trademarks. Lizzo’s company, Lizzo LLC, applied for two word trademarks in June 2019 for 100% THAT BITCH for various types of clothing after she popularized the phrase in her 2017 hit single … Continue reading

Transliterations of Chinese Characters Require a Translation Statement

Photo of Nathan Mannebach (US)By Nathan Mannebach (US) on Posted in Intellectual Property, Trademark
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) refused registration of the mark “ZHIMA” because the applicant, Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd., did not submit a translation of ZHIMA into English. In re Advanced New Techs. Co., 2023 TTAB LEXIS 2, 2023 WL 181172 (TTAB Jan. 12, 2023). In the original refusal, the Examining Attorney determined … Continue reading

USPTO Adds 75 Climate and Green-Tech Terms to Trademark ID Manual

Photo of Kaylee A. Sill (US)By Kaylee A. Sill (US) on Posted in Intellectual Property, Trademark
Earlier this month, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced that it is adding new climate and green tech-related terms to the Trademark ID Manual. The USPTO has already added 75 terms that include biomethane, research and development in the field of wind energy, and treatment of captured landfill gasses. Practically, the addition … Continue reading

The Battle Continues After TTAB Refuses Registration for #LAW for Failure to Function as a Trademark

Photo of Kirsten Hash (US)By Kirsten Hash (US) on Posted in Intellectual Property, Trademark
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) refused registration of #LAW on the Principal Register finding that #LAW failed to function as a trademark. Pound Law, LLC (“Pound Law” or “Applicant”) was unable to convince the Board that its vanity phone number functions as a trademark for legal services and legal referral services. In re … Continue reading

TTAB Sustains Opposition Based on Applicant’s Failure to Secure the Consent of a Living Individual

Photo of Felicia Boyd (US)Photo of Kirsten Hash (US)By Felicia Boyd (US) and Kirsten Hash (US) on Posted in Intellectual Property, Trademark
Terminal Moraine Inc. (“Applicant” or “Terminal Moraine”) sought registration on the Principal Register of the mark: for the following goods and services: Mystery Ranch, Ltd. (“Mystery Ranch” or “Opposer”) opposed registration of the DANA DESIGN mark based on an alleged false suggestion of a connection with Mystery Ranch and Dana Gleason, Mystery Ranch’s co-owner, under … Continue reading

Supreme Court to Examine the Reach of the Lanham Act to Impose Liability on Conduct Outside of the United States

Photo of Felicia Boyd (US)Photo of Tim Kenny (US)By Felicia Boyd (US) and Tim Kenny (US) on Posted in Intellectual Property, Trademark
Sections 32(1)(a) and 43(a)(1)(A) of the Lanham Act impose civil liability on any person who “use[s] in commerce” a trademark in a manner that “is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.”  15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a); 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(1). Notably, the Lanham Act defines commerce broadly as “all commerce which may lawfully … Continue reading

NFTs and IP – Your opportunity to comment

Photo of Felicia Boyd (US)Photo of Susan Ross (US)By Felicia Boyd (US) and Susan Ross (US) on Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property, Patents, technology and innovation, Trademark
On November 23, 2022, the US Patent and Trademark Office and the US Copyright Office issued a request for public comment on the subject of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and intellectual property rights. Comments are due by Monday, January 9, 2023. In addition, the Offices will offer three public roundtables:  one panel on NFTs and patents … Continue reading

Authorization of certain IP-related transactions in Russia

Photo of Tim Kenny (US)By Tim Kenny (US) on Posted in Intellectual Property
The ink was not even dry on the update regarding Russia-related IP issues that we published last week, when we learned of two more major developments. The USPTO recently issued the following statement on engagement with Russia, the Eurasian Patent Organization and Belarus: Per guidance issued by the U.S. Department of State, the United States Patent and Trademark Office … Continue reading

Key current considerations in handling IP rights in Russia

Photo of Tim Kenny (US)By Tim Kenny (US) on Posted in Intellectual Property
February 24, 2022, Russian troops poured over the border into Ukraine, unleashing unimaginable human suffering and widespread destruction of property. Russia’s aggression also ignited negative consequences in the international economy that continue to increase and cascade throughout all sectors and corners of the globe. As companies and other entities struggle to navigate the broader macro-economic … Continue reading

TTAB rules reckless disregard for the truth constitutes fraud

Photo of Kaylee A. Sill (US)By Kaylee A. Sill (US) on Posted in Brands, Consumer goods, Intellectual Property, technology and innovation
In Chutter, Inc. v. Great Management Group, LLC, a precedential decision, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) held that recklessly false representations made during the course of the trademark application process satisfy the level of intent required to support a finding of fraud before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).[1] The TTAB’s … Continue reading

Spotify successfully opposes POTIFY applications based on dilution by blurring

Photo of Felicia Boyd (US)By Felicia Boyd (US) on Posted in Brands, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Trademark
In its first precedential decision of 2022, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) sustained two oppositions filed by Spotify AB (“Spotify”) against registration of POTIFY for use in connection with an online ordering platform and community for medical and recreational cannabis consumers to connect with legal marijuana retailers.  Both oppositions were sustained on Spotify’s … Continue reading

NFTs and Intellectual Property Rights

Photo of Will GartonPhoto of Farah Mukaddam (UK)By Will Garton and Farah Mukaddam (UK) on Posted in Ethics, General, Intellectual Property, technology and innovation
Any creative endeavour is in theory capable of being tokenised or “NFT’d”. Record prices are being reached for the sale of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). But what are NFTs? How are they created? Why are they so valuable? What does the buyer own? What rights do they confer? And why should IP lawyers care? Click here … Continue reading

Planning to import chemicals in to Australia from overseas?

Photo of Georgina Hey (AU)By Georgina Hey (AU) and Anthony Brzoska on Posted in Consumer goods, Intellectual Property
Australian businesses are increasingly turning to overseas manufacturers to fulfil domestic demand for chemicals and chemical-based consumer products. Year on year, figures show that Australian companies are importing increasing volumes of these products, with some of the strongest performers coming from the domestic fuel, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic sectors of the chemicals-based consumer market. The advantages … Continue reading

Choc it out: Lindt’s golden bunny granted trade mark recognition in the EU

Photo of Frances Drummond (AU)Photo of Isobel Taylor (AU)By Frances Drummond (AU) and Isobel Taylor (AU) on Posted in Trademark
It is well-established that a shape or colour alone can function as a trade mark, that is, a badge of origin indicating to consumers the source of the relevant goods or services. However, in practice, achieving the level of ubiquity required to be granted such a trade mark registration can be difficult.[1] It is also … Continue reading

Consultation Open for Australia’s Medical and Biotechnology Patent Box

Photo of Jackie O'Brien (AU)By Jackie O'Brien (AU) on Posted in General, Intellectual Property, Patents
On 5 July 2021, the Government released its Discussion Paper setting out the Government’s proposal and seeking views from key stakeholders. The paper will be open for submissions until 16 August 2021.   Now is the opportunity for stakeholders to put forward their suggestions as to what a patent box in Australia should entail. Patent boxes … Continue reading

China quietly updates its Copyright Law

Photo of Justin Davidson (HK)Photo of Edward Yau (HK)By Justin Davidson (HK) and Edward Yau (HK) on Posted in Copyright, Intellectual Property
On 11 November 2020, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress passed the amendments to the China Copyright Law (the Amendments), which will take effect on 1 June 2021. This is the third time the Copyright Law has been amended since it was promulgated in 1990. The first comprehensive amendment took place in 2001, … Continue reading

German Federal Constitutional Court rules on constitutional procedural rights of interim injunction defendants

Photo of Maximilian SchmitzPhoto of Tiffany ZillioxBy Maximilian Schmitz and Tiffany Zilliox on Posted in General
The German Federal Constitutional Court has handed down several landmark decisions which strengthen defendant rights in interim injunction proceedings (Federal Constitutional Court decision of  27 June 2020, case no. 1 BvR 1379/20; decision of 3 June 2020, case no. 1 BvR 1246/20; decisions of 30 September 2018, case no.  1 BvR 1783/17 and 1 BvR … Continue reading

Singapore leads the way on promoting its IP Hub

Photo of Justin Davidson (HK)Photo of Jeremiah ChewBy Justin Davidson (HK) and Jeremiah Chew on Posted in General, Trademark
The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) made headlines recently when its Chief Executive, Daren Tang, was appointed as the next Director-General of the World Intellectual Property Organisation with effect from 1 October 2020 (see this link for more information). As Chief Executive of IPOS since November 2015, Daren has earned accolades for several initiatives … Continue reading
LexBlog