On September 19, 2014, a federal district judge allowed a consumer class action to proceed against the marketer and seller of an over-the-counter “male enhancement product,” finding that the plaintiff adequately pled facts to support false advertising and unfair competition
October 2014
Top 10 reasons to read the new and improved Brand Protection Blog
For more than two years, the Brand Protection Blog has posted timely information to help you promote and safeguard your brands in today’s increasingly competitive marketplace.
Today we re-launch the Brand Protection Blog with a new look and tools to…