Skip to content

menu

The Brand Protection Blog logo
HomeAboutContact
Search
Close
TrademarkAdvertisingCopyrightIntellectual PropertyCounterfeiting
View topics Archives
Subscribe

The Brand Protection Blog

Covering the legal developments impacting your brands

trademark infringement

Subscribe to trademark infringement via RSS

Supreme Court to Examine the Reach of the Lanham Act to Impose Liability on Conduct Outside of the United States

Photo of Tim Kenny (US)Photo of Felicia Boyd (US)
By Tim Kenny (US) & Felicia Boyd (US) on November 29, 2022

Sections 32(1)(a) and 43(a)(1)(A) of the Lanham Act impose civil liability on any person who “use[s] in commerce” a trademark in a manner that “is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.”  15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a); 15…

Choc it out: Lindt’s golden bunny granted trade mark recognition in the EU

Photo of Isobel Taylor (AU)Photo of Frances Drummond (AU)
By Isobel Taylor (AU) & Frances Drummond (AU) on September 15, 2021

It is well-established that a shape or colour alone can function as a trade mark, that is, a badge of origin indicating to consumers the source of the relevant goods or services. However, in practice, achieving the level of ubiquity…

Willfulness not required for profits awards in trademark infringement suits

Photo of Tim Kenny (US)
By Tim Kenny (US) & Joy Wang (US) on April 24, 2020

A trademark infringement suit is not required to show willful infringement as a precondition to a disgorgement of the infringers’ profits.…

Could the use of Punitive Damages be the way forward in China?

Photo of Justin Davidson (HK)Photo of Phoebe Poon (HK)
By Justin Davidson (HK) & Phoebe Poon (HK) on April 17, 2020

In September 2019, the Shanghai Pudong District People’s Court awarded triple punitive damages to Balanced Body Inc., which according to the Shanghai government news report was the first such award for a Shanghai Court to a foreign plaintiff.

Background

Balanced…

Subscribe to The Brand Protection Blog

Subscribe to this publication

Trademarks, Internet sales, and personal jurisdiction

Photo of Susan Ross (US)Photo of Tim Kenny (US)
By Susan Ross (US) & Tim Kenny (US) on March 31, 2020

On February 10, 2020, the Seventh Circuit federal appeals court ruled that an Illinois-based seller of dietary supplements could maintain a federal Lanham Act and Illinois state law claims against a California-based competitor that had only an online presence, and…

Australian Trademarks Law Review – Edition 2

Photo of Isobel Taylor (AU)Photo of Frances Drummond (AU)Photo of Sophie Lees (AU)
By Isobel Taylor (AU), Frances Drummond (AU) & Sophie Lees (AU) on November 26, 2018

2018 marked the publication of the first Australian Trademarks Law Review from the Law Review series. The Law Review collates cross-border legal insights and analysis across a range of practice areas and is a useful resource for in-house counsel of…

Cryptocurrency and trademarks – a lesson in jurisdiction

Photo of Susan Ross (US)
By Susan Ross (US) & Kathleen Scott (US) on November 6, 2018

On October 22, 2018, a federal trial court in Manhattan granted web services conglomerate Alibaba Group Holding Limited’s request for a preliminary injunction against several defendants that were offering cryptocurrency for sale, under the name “AlibabaCoin.” (Alibaba Group Holding…

Amended Australian IP laws receive Royal Assent with little fanfare

Photo of Georgina Hey (AU)Photo of Isobel Taylor (AU)
By Georgina Hey (AU) & Isobel Taylor (AU) on September 24, 2018

On 24 August 2018, the creatively named Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Productivity Commission Response Part 1 and Other Measures) Bill 2018 quietly received Royal Assent, with some parts of the new Act entering into force the following day.

As the…

Changes proposed regarding parallel imports – An exhausting concept for Australian trade mark owners?

Photo of Frances Drummond (AU)Photo of Rebecca Brenikov (AU)
By Frances Drummond (AU) & Rebecca Brenikov (AU) on April 6, 2018

In this article, we consider;

  • the changes to the Trade Marks Act proposed in respect of parallel imports which the Draft Explanatory Memorandum states are aimed at ensuring that the law “better meet[s] the objective of facilitating the parallel

…

The European Commission has its say: EU trade marks post-Brexit

Photo of Georgina Hey (AU)Photo of Sophie Lees (AU)
By Georgina Hey (AU) & Sophie Lees (AU) on March 15, 2018

On 28 February 2018, the European Commission released its draft withdrawal agreement setting out a proposal on the arrangements for the withdrawal of the UK from the EU (Withdrawal Agreement). The full text of the Withdrawal Agreement can…

Post navigation

 Newer PostsOlder Posts 

The Brand Protection Blog

Facebook Twitter RSS LinkedIn YouTube
Published by
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP logo
DisclaimerPrivacy policy

About

Now you can get timely information to help you promote and safeguard your brands in today’s increasingly competitive marketplace. The Brand Protection Blog reports on developments and trends in all areas of the law that impact brands, including the creation, promotion and protection of branded products and services.

Read more

Topics

Archives

Copyright © 2025, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP. All rights reserved.